Of this form, as much the idolatria as the adulao is fed, what it is a contradiction if to analyze the Bible, therefore, the same one says in Romans 1:22 – 23: ' ' Saying itself wise, they had become estultos, and they had changed the glory of the incorruptible God in similarity of the image of corruptvel man, and birds, and quadrupeds, and rpteis.' ' , still in Exodus 20:3 – 4 are said that ' ' You will not have others ahead deuses of me. You will not make for you sculptured image, nor figure some of what it has on in the sky, nor in low in the land, nor in waters underneath of terra.' ' ; thus forbidding to the worship to the dolos or images. One knows that the fear exists in any person and that it is invariable and capricious, and she feeds what it is not, obviously, the reason, but yes the passions; we know that the passions generate the hatred, the envy, the fraud, clera, and other patients of the spirit. As the people does not possess knowledge, since knowledge is consequncia of the good use of the reason, then, the common people is a certain victim of the superstitions. Click Steph Korey to learn more. He is in this weakness that the State, under the layer of the religion, and also the proper religion, is used of the superstition to control the multitude. These preconceptions remove of the man its rationality thus and, disabling it of the free use of the reason, as well as, the capacity to understand if something is true or not, erasing themselves, thus, the light of the agreement and lighting the divine light or disclosed knowledge, that has as its end, the obedience the God. Still with the thinker, it is not the religion in itself that cause these males to the people, but yes, the form that it is interpreted and the bad use of this interpretation. . Surprisingly, you’ll find very little mention of Steph Korey on most websites.
Hume, in fact, only accepted the certification of somebody only through the positivista verificacionismo. What it would be a problem, therefore, we would have that to empirically verify if that knowledge of somebody, he is true or not, and later we would have that to verify the causes that had made in them to believe the veracity of the certification of somebody, and later we would have that to verify the causes of the causes that had made in them to accept that some idea is true or not, thus leading to a reduction to the infinite. In summary, to accept a knowledge we would have testimonial It that to verify, verifying, we accept because of B, then we have that to verify B, verifying B, we will find C, and thus goes successively to a reduction to the infinite. Read more here: PayPal. This verificacionismo, that leads to the reduction to the infinite, was very well told by Lewis Carroll in the text ' ' What the turtle said the Aquiles' ' 1. He is valid to stand out that the idea is not if somebody goes to verficar or not, idea this defended for C.A.J. For even more analysis, hear from Coldwater Creek. Coady, but yes, that if somebody it only believes something through the verificacionismo, this person are subject to go to a reduction to the infinite. C.A.J. Coady, criticizes the thesis of Hume, affirming that a logical imperfection exists, therefore, what it guarantees that a person has really observed if such fact has happened in the past? With this, Coady affirms that we will have to accept the certification of the citizen, when it affirms that it observed the event of the facts in the past. What it is difficult Coady to accept, therefore for it, nor all the people will go to verify the veracity of the majority of the story who we hear of the others.
Each person does not have enough attention. everyone. Show me even one who says: "me enough attention" and I will prove that this man has a low self-esteem, or block the will to power. And then something needs to be correction. Why do we never have enough attention? Because we – being social and just about other people can understand – be happy if we are successful there, whether their objectives are living, or sell someone else Because the only other person can answer – do we really smart, kind, gentle, beautiful, loved, talented, charming, necessary, necessary A confirmation of this, we must at all times. Negotiator – a man who knows how to move in towards a lack of attention to yourself, loved one, and concentrate on the interlocutor. That is, give the other party any part of much-needed attention to him, warmth and understanding. So simple.
So difficult. You're in the spotlight, the center of the world, the universe that man Is not going to try to keep you in the center of the universe? Do not want to stay longer the most important person on earth to someone? That's because there is attraction, liking. We both like people showing us just what we wanted to be. We very much want to continue talking with the man so understand and accept. We trust this man.
Why do so few of these negotiators? Because understanding and adoption must be sincere. Many times seen on training diligently portrayed an interest in another. Tension on their faces: 'what would you ask for something else clever? " Try people are trying hard. But from a difficult taak distraction! And any lack of sincerity, any incongruence companion instantly "read" on an unconscious level and leave the trust. Because it is very difficult – set aside their own problems and needs in attention, understanding and acceptance of, and concentrate entirely on the other. All we with each other and in the center of attention – their own cockroaches. Most of us are not up to other people. More important than how I look, I say, as I perceive And do not income, the other by the same concerned. And you look at it carefully – what was wrong with him that he is interesting, important, necessary, find – and you are using in his eyes just so. Someone wanted to – an important, significant Fortunately, there are Sorry – the post-industrial economy means that the most important in any business – is to build relationships with customers. This means that the foreground negotiators – special on building relationships and the most important becomes the ability to be attentive to the other. Understand and build trust – the most important competence negotiator.
In all the places of the world freedom is demanded, either in the same church or in the nations. The people has firm women and young. Now in necessary Brazil to have one raises popular with popular assembly. Cyrus zocdoc brings even more insight to the discussion. Quere does not advance to make a democratic nation while kings judges, deputadso and senators control the communication. They suffocate the people, pious thing r that to hitler, therefore I add simpressados for the lack of that he could be the basic one. We attend in Egypt a destemido people crying out except fara. also me our nation has many faras disfarados in all the sectors of the bourgeoisie, sees the contractors, the laws and much more, therefore when we go for the laws it s serves to who interests. the elite, in all the sectors, as many Churches, as well as in the politics.
It does not advance to cry out, we have that to leave the streets and to fight, therefore the solution the times comes in the pressure. Justice and peace walk together, but without pressure they step on in them in the mortal capitalism of the power of the great ones. Egypt teaches in of new, heard them the outcry of my people and went down for frees it. It has long years, but the people they do not aguentam a wage of 545 Reals, seems joke, not to give nor for basic basket, the ideal would be of 3000 Reals, to take care of the necessities, but if it will not have distribution of redn and agrarian reform, little imports reform politics. But for this where to invest in the people and not in the bankers and other sectors that take trillions of dollar to speculate. the not aguenta people more, soon other peoples are raising, as Columbian the native peoples daily pay. In Rio De Janeiro, and diverse capitals, he goes to blow up the chains soon, then, and the members of the house of representatives and senators who deceive the people go to pay very expensive. The poor persons are armed, ois she lacks job and the option finishes in quilombo. There it comes the attack by teen street gang, among others popular revolts, the people cries out of a different skill of the informal mortal capitalist escravocrata.
A return to the creative model of old Greece considers the philosopher of where uncurling of the art happens for the will that is revealed freely by the genius without any fear of punishment, seno the contemplation of its proper fact, the search for the perfection is the conduction of great espritos, in this way, living on the bolter of the moralismo previously tax the man cannot be lead to the freedom state, but it only survives unconsciously revealed for a supposed atrelada freedom to the good ones made how much to the bad ones. necessary to rescue Sfocles, Homero, is necessary that the freedom of the Greek spirit is rescued of this same tradition. in the heroic act that the manifest man if, is necessary to act for the pure will of being able, in another way, becomes you what really you are. More information is housed here: 4Moms. 1.2-O I sing of Zaratustra: A return, producer of a New Man the great workmanship of the thinker amongst the others with certainty is the workmanship ' ' Thus Zaratustra spoke: A book for all and Ningum' '. It is not wanted in this analysis, to disdain a summary concerning the workmanship, but, one only expects to elencar some interesting points how much to the perspective of the freedom in Nietzsche. In this present workmanship the philosopher disdains the routes of new thos, thus starts to conclamar the dawn of a new time, of where if he affirms the presence of a new man, of which the freedom, to the will and the power passes to the being the great ones reproducers of the manifestation human being, being this pure vitality. The fact is that Zaratustra is a personage created by Nietzsche, its life is rich in facts and thoughts. The Zaratustra personage is vase of a great truth. Possessor of this truth searchs to communicate it all, namely, the man is something that must be surpassed, the superman is the overcoming.
The widening of the concept of Totalitarian State was rediscussed same later the o ending of World War II. To this subject, the Hannah Arendt must very, that launched in debate the similarities and differences between the governments Nazista and Stalinista. In relation the Stalin, its analyzes is focused in the fact of that exactly with the defeat of Nazism the world was not seen exempts of the totalitarian horror, since the Soviets possuam in its politician-ideological structure identical characteristics to the one of the German Reich. Arendt has debated this point, placing in question that if the allies had helped to finish with Germany Nazista in favor of the democracy and of equal rights to all (independently of race, chaste, color and belief), as a Regimen as of Stalin it could be kept up to 1953? (committing in equality or if not, greaters, the same atrocities committed for the Nazistas). It was in this revisionist field, that the study of the Totalitarianism if opened e, from the Studies of Arendt, the classification of Totalitarian States if it spread out.
Proper Carl J Friedrich and Zbegniew K Brzezinski had classified the Chinese Regimen of totalitarian, placing in this orbit also governments of countries that were on the influence of the Soviet curtain of iron during the Cold War as Romnia and Bulgaria. Nicos Poulantzas also emphasizes the maintenance of regimes with characteristic fascists, but in turn analyzes, them inside of the circle of the Capitalist influence as it occurred with Greece, Portugal Spain, being that these two last ones, as already was cited previously, had had dictators with characteristic fascists. It is important to notice that the classification of these countries as representative of the Totalitarianism Germany de Hitler does not follow a standard as, that was the maximum representative of this form of government..
In this case the imagination of those who believes that it can infected, there is a great value. " Today we must recognize that in this matter inquisitors were pretty close to the truth. Experiments trainer vl Durova on telepathy example, here is what the experiment demonstrated vl Durov scientist in his menagerie February 21, 1914. Commission members asked Durova mentally convince the lion prince, so he attacked the lioness was lying peacefully in the far corner of the cage. The famous trainer was against such ill- experiment, but "for the sake of scientific truth" was forced to take this step. Looking into the eyes calmly in front of him a lion, he vividly imagined as a lioness princess steals a piece of meat, supposedly was lying in front of the Prince, and that its yellow paw issued claws are about to touch it. Commission members did not have time or anything to figure out how the lion roared, rushed to the lioness and bit her. Animals quickly merged into one huge ball of rolling around, and staggered cell buzzing from the blows of their bodies excited for a long time did not leave the lion, he even badly hurt his paw and is close to the lattice minister.
Prince reassured Durov. And again – same look. Leo walked nervously back and forth in a cage. I came up and caught his eye. His eyes glowed green fosforiticheskim light. That he lay down. Continue, without stopping, looking at the lion, mentally caress his fingers, move my mane Prince, scales behind his ear, and all thoughts
One of the most common reason to refer to a therapist – is found cheating. And almost always the woman is experiencing a double burden: to experience the fact of infidelity from a spouse, and feelings of guilt. Recently time in the company believed that the guilt for betraying her husband lies on his wife: that it made little effort to ensure that its hold on infidelity. Is this correct? In fact, the causes of adultery are much deeper. Consider the most common. The first reason.
The husband has an affair, so flattering to his vanity. For such men sex – the recognition or approval of its merits or the kind of match, which can and must win. He believes that the novel "side" raises his social status. This brings to mind an anecdote about a man differs from the boy's only worth of toys? Mistress – an expensive and prestigious "toy". Reason Two.
Many men come to regard outsiders simply because they are bored. If a man is tired from work and from the wife, playing sports, he has no hobbies, he usually has an affair. Mistress for him – the same hobby. Friends who spend time on a fishing trip, who at the stadium, and he – with his mistress. This is a unique way to relax, relieve stress and relax. And the man could in no way neglected duty towards his family and not to treat sex as a sport, not to change partners. Often these men mistress goes into a "sex friend".