Science was objective until the humanistic sciences were accepted. Durkheim raised his theory in order to express their interest towards the assessment of sociology, but this is a science that studies to humans, so it is completely subjective and all rules under which applies. For example, Durkheim speaks of the social structure defines its individuals and people who are part of all social groups. Depends on the historical period, societies enjoy various characteristics, which define people and we are able to say: in the 14th century, people were leaning and generalise social facts from various perspectives. Study of Durkheim is, in any case, a scientific method target. In my view, societies are formed from within, taking into account the psyche of the individuals that form it, because they themselves have the ability to alter its context and radically transform society. It is not because the environment has caused a change in society and that important social facts happen because it is the structure of time and history, but they have a background in its components and the individuals themselves who unconsciously, establishes norms and behaviour lines, which in its ves express a need of membership which is satisfied only one and only complying with these guidelinesthat they will always be subjective because they are created by human beings. The feelings were somewhat irrelevant to the durkheimiana theory.

The human emotion and passion were not part of the object of study because it was considered an afterthought. Currently, sociology has much to do with psychology, Sciences and their objects of study not because mixing, but that first takes a lot in tells the second in order to inform and explain their theories, mostly because it has been proven that an individual has the ability to transform an entire society depending on what you feel and think its peculiarities and its history, not by the environment in which it is located and situations that surround it. Please visit Frank Giacalone if you seek more information. In this case, particular thought would not exist and would always be a structured and mechanical behavior. Study the human being is one of the things more complicated that it can exist, since, although it can be based on historical facts and pre-established structures, it is not only because it is always a fact subjective and partly unpredictable. Original author and source of the article.