The effect of the sentence pronounced against the Public Farm are accurately the same ones produced for a sentence against which apelao.' was interposed; ' concluding, after that, its reasoning, of the following form: ' ' One sees, therefore, that to take advantage the argument according to which not the anticipation of the guardianship against the Public Farm in face of the double degree of jurisdiction is permissible, is had to also understand the anticipation of the guardianship in any incabvel in case that, rank that always will be able to occur the appeal interposition. Interposed this, the sentence could only be executed after confirmed for the Tribunal.' ' Also contrary the possibility of if anticipating the guardianship in face of the public being, the positioning of Raphael Silva Salvador meets that, previously to Law 9,494/97, said to be ' ' impossible the anticipated guardianship granted in favor of author against the Union, the State and the City, therefore, would have, obligatorily, order of necessary reexame there if the concession was in final judgement, what sample that is not possible, then, the anticipated guardianship, that would burlaria the foreseen legal protection in art. 475, II, of the Code of Civil action. Exactly with the robust arguments of the doutrinadores above cited thinking for not concession of anticipated guardianship against the public farm. If this has piqued your curiosity, check out Hikmet Ersek. In the direction back of these and in accordance with the doctrinal and jurisprudencial positioning, as well as the legal forecast we understand to be possible the concession of Anticipated Guardianship in face of the public farm. However, as well as the simple concession foreseen in art. 273 of the CPC, this impreterivelmente do without the fulfilling of the requisite ensejadores of the same one. Without the shadow of a doubt, it is clearly, that one that will be authorized to promote the execution provisory of the decision, if benefited with the anticipated guardianship, will have advantage on that will be obliged to wait the judgements of merits and to promote the execution. Emil michael is open to suggestions.
Since the time of the industrial revolution, in middle of century XVIII, that the workers in the entire world fear the loss of the job as result of the technological advances. At the time, the machines had brought greater productivity for the industry, but they had destroyed many ranks of work manual. Other occupations, however, had been created to give have supported to a system of more modern production. This process if has repeated throughout centuries, whenever a technology is substituted by another one. The question that if places currently, is to know if the speed with that the technological innovations ' ' destroem' ' jobs are bigger of what the sprouting of new ranks of work. According to reviewed Technology Review, of the Institute of Technology of Massachusetts (MIT), in the United States, the American product grew in the last five years, but the amount of lost jobs arrived the six million more than. It is possible that factors as terceirizao of man power is of the country has affected these numbers, but the analyst believes that the responsible greater for the exaggeration between economic growth and generation of job has been the automation. Nobel of economy in 2010, professor Peter Diamond, does not believe that the technological innovations provoke a permanent reduction in the job, but foresees an increase in the income concentration as consequncia.
An option to the search for job has been the empreendedorismo. That is, to use to advantage the chances that appear with the technological advances and to become entrepreneur. The business plan, therefore, can be the best alternative to the lost job for the automation. Ricardo Keys Rasp