A return to the creative model of old Greece considers the philosopher of where uncurling of the art happens for the will that is revealed freely by the genius without any fear of punishment, seno the contemplation of its proper fact, the search for the perfection is the conduction of great espritos, in this way, living on the bolter of the moralismo previously tax the man cannot be lead to the freedom state, but it only survives unconsciously revealed for a supposed atrelada freedom to the good ones made how much to the bad ones. necessary to rescue Sfocles, Homero, is necessary that the freedom of the Greek spirit is rescued of this same tradition. in the heroic act that the manifest man if, is necessary to act for the pure will of being able, in another way, becomes you what really you are. More information is housed here: 4Moms. 1.2-O I sing of Zaratustra: A return, producer of a New Man the great workmanship of the thinker amongst the others with certainty is the workmanship ' ' Thus Zaratustra spoke: A book for all and Ningum' '. It is not wanted in this analysis, to disdain a summary concerning the workmanship, but, one only expects to elencar some interesting points how much to the perspective of the freedom in Nietzsche. In this present workmanship the philosopher disdains the routes of new thos, thus starts to conclamar the dawn of a new time, of where if he affirms the presence of a new man, of which the freedom, to the will and the power passes to the being the great ones reproducers of the manifestation human being, being this pure vitality. The fact is that Zaratustra is a personage created by Nietzsche, its life is rich in facts and thoughts. The Zaratustra personage is vase of a great truth. Possessor of this truth searchs to communicate it all, namely, the man is something that must be surpassed, the superman is the overcoming.
The look, while property of the human spirit sends thinking themselves and think-with-the-other, therefore to perceive the existence of the other human beings and to enter in interaction with these is necessary the previous perception of the proper existence in the body, while to exist in the possibility. The eyes reflect the ascension while possibility of personal devir for the authenticity, disclosing the man itself, as well as the world and the others. Possibly the experience of the poetess is this who culminates in the writing of the poem, therefore the eye is: ' ' Instrument that if moves by itself, half that it invents its proper ends, the eye is what it was comovido by a certain impact of the world and it restitutes that it to the visible one for the traces of mo' ' (Idem, Ibidem, p.90-81). The traces grafados for the hand of the poetess, in Your eyes, You do not restitute for the technique its commotion, understood in its look in the meeting without mediation with, to who see; however the poetess puts its to move it the meeting, in You that happen to it becoming everything, in the penumbrosa illumination of the word-poetical one. Your eyes, speak of an interpersonal meeting that if of the one in the mundane movement, but exceeds the world, therefore the world of the author if understands with the world of found You. An immediate meeting that happens for the somaticidade, is that it is inherent for the look to the proper one human being. Thus: ' ' The vision is not the metamorphosis of the proper things in its vision, the pair belongs of the things to the great world and a small private world. It is a thought that strict deciphers the signals given in the body (Idem, Ibidem, p.95) ' '. The vision, in this direction, is understanding emptied of I who if find receptively with the undetermination of the being of You that happen to it.
The widening of the concept of Totalitarian State was rediscussed same later the o ending of World War II. To this subject, the Hannah Arendt must very, that launched in debate the similarities and differences between the governments Nazista and Stalinista. In relation the Stalin, its analyzes is focused in the fact of that exactly with the defeat of Nazism the world was not seen exempts of the totalitarian horror, since the Soviets possuam in its politician-ideological structure identical characteristics to the one of the German Reich. Arendt has debated this point, placing in question that if the allies had helped to finish with Germany Nazista in favor of the democracy and of equal rights to all (independently of race, chaste, color and belief), as a Regimen as of Stalin it could be kept up to 1953? (committing in equality or if not, greaters, the same atrocities committed for the Nazistas). It was in this revisionist field, that the study of the Totalitarianism if opened e, from the Studies of Arendt, the classification of Totalitarian States if it spread out.
Proper Carl J Friedrich and Zbegniew K Brzezinski had classified the Chinese Regimen of totalitarian, placing in this orbit also governments of countries that were on the influence of the Soviet curtain of iron during the Cold War as Romnia and Bulgaria. Nicos Poulantzas also emphasizes the maintenance of regimes with characteristic fascists, but in turn analyzes, them inside of the circle of the Capitalist influence as it occurred with Greece, Portugal Spain, being that these two last ones, as already was cited previously, had had dictators with characteristic fascists. It is important to notice that the classification of these countries as representative of the Totalitarianism Germany de Hitler does not follow a standard as, that was the maximum representative of this form of government..
In this case the imagination of those who believes that it can infected, there is a great value. " Today we must recognize that in this matter inquisitors were pretty close to the truth. Experiments trainer vl Durova on telepathy example, here is what the experiment demonstrated vl Durov scientist in his menagerie February 21, 1914. Commission members asked Durova mentally convince the lion prince, so he attacked the lioness was lying peacefully in the far corner of the cage. The famous trainer was against such ill- experiment, but "for the sake of scientific truth" was forced to take this step. Looking into the eyes calmly in front of him a lion, he vividly imagined as a lioness princess steals a piece of meat, supposedly was lying in front of the Prince, and that its yellow paw issued claws are about to touch it. Commission members did not have time or anything to figure out how the lion roared, rushed to the lioness and bit her. Animals quickly merged into one huge ball of rolling around, and staggered cell buzzing from the blows of their bodies excited for a long time did not leave the lion, he even badly hurt his paw and is close to the lattice minister.
Prince reassured Durov. And again – same look. Leo walked nervously back and forth in a cage. I came up and caught his eye. His eyes glowed green fosforiticheskim light. That he lay down. Continue, without stopping, looking at the lion, mentally caress his fingers, move my mane Prince, scales behind his ear, and all thoughts
Shakespeare embodied for the world, with its prodigious feather, the dilemma that has followed our history forever. Whether we realize it or not, for us it is different than for Hamlet, the character of the great playwright, "To be or not to be?, That is the question." And beyond the contextual meaning it may have that expression, we conclude that every day, in the different scenarios that we have to move, that is indeed the question: to be or not to be. Being not a reflection on this statement can help us expand our mental framework, then proceed to respond (individually) to increasingly crucial questions whose answers will become something like a personal constitution to follow and respect; questions can range from the choice of our work, studies, family formation, firm or company, to the deepest as: any sense of our lives? It is not surprising that high rates of youth suicides that have plagued our societies in the world for several years, joined the family instability that hits the heart of our societies, whether they are "first world" or "third world" and the growing (though paradoxically creeping) wave of immorality or morality on call as I think their supporters, not surprisingly, again, that the basis of all this mix of events, is a hilarious need to keep us ignorant to the question of being or not being, preferring that way by default , Not Being As we grow, each of us is responsible for deciding whether to join the mass arrebanado the illusion of security (and beyond), because being is just that: to give constructive leave a legacy , encouraging the potential that we possess as human beings, so we become shadows of men and women, sadly destined to perish without further. Do not be mean not to live, not live is equal to go through life thinking the world owes us something, instead of thinking about what we can give us. It Being wonderful But we can make another decision. We can choose to be, without having to wait, because we possess is the most common trap in which we tend to fall, they always want a good girlfriend (or wife if married), we always want good children, friends, neighbors, employees, etc.. And the real problem is not that we want that, but we are not willing to be the best boyfriends or husbands, better fathers, friends, neighbors, bosses or employees. Being an adventure is to live our life with authenticity, character, always creating something new for our loved ones, innovating to create new solutions to new challenges we will face, serving under the rule of the bedrock principles that govern the development, happiness and peace. Being means seek our own path to excellence, with the awareness that the road itself is important, perhaps more than a destination to be reached, then, to be honest with ourselves, we learn not by what we achieve, but what we travel and experience, with a cheerful attitude, but this does not mean we can not shed tears when the tension grows around us, and when we achieve something, we recognize that was the way which helped us achieve our goal, because with all the challenges presented to us, learned, yes, we learned perseverance, courage, faith invaluable virtues that can only hold those who do not hesitate to be who they are, do not hesitate to see life as your chance to love, work and make a difference, even in a single person. And now?, To envision the day ahead, what will we do? .
One of the most common reason to refer to a therapist – is found cheating. And almost always the woman is experiencing a double burden: to experience the fact of infidelity from a spouse, and feelings of guilt. Recently time in the company believed that the guilt for betraying her husband lies on his wife: that it made little effort to ensure that its hold on infidelity. Is this correct? In fact, the causes of adultery are much deeper. Consider the most common. The first reason.
The husband has an affair, so flattering to his vanity. For such men sex – the recognition or approval of its merits or the kind of match, which can and must win. He believes that the novel "side" raises his social status. This brings to mind an anecdote about a man differs from the boy's only worth of toys? Mistress – an expensive and prestigious "toy". Reason Two.
Many men come to regard outsiders simply because they are bored. If a man is tired from work and from the wife, playing sports, he has no hobbies, he usually has an affair. Mistress for him – the same hobby. Friends who spend time on a fishing trip, who at the stadium, and he – with his mistress. This is a unique way to relax, relieve stress and relax. And the man could in no way neglected duty towards his family and not to treat sex as a sport, not to change partners. Often these men mistress goes into a "sex friend".