A single exists in other industries, such as mining or natural resources, determining conditions of the factors that is decisive. For example, says, that Saudi Arabia exports oil because it possesses that resource, not because it has favorable demand conditions, support, strategies, structures, or rivalry of their companies and related industries. Management should know that the relative importance of the different determinants in an industry dependent on propellants for competitive success in the same. It is wrong to assume that the mixture of the determinants required to achieve success on an international scale is the same for all the industries. In reality, the country or countries that have a critical mass of favourable conditions in the determinants which are most important for that industry, will have an advantage over other countries. Equally, it is wrong to conclude that have advantages in all determinants constitutes the most suitable and sustainable situation. Hold a national advantage in a specific industry depends on the nature of competition in the industry, how these advantages relate to the determinants and how they both change over time.
An advantage in a single determinant (e.g. a specific natural resource) could be more sustainable than temporary advantages in several of them. To all this must be added other factors where management should be prepared according to the characteristics of the national and international stages such as: economic reality, its stability, its casualties, its crisis that crucially affect the financial life of the company, as well as affect the behavior of their consumers in regard to the adquisisicon of the products. New economic openings, partnerships, agreements and everything that this generates for the possibilities to enter new markets, how to protect the already conquered. The actions of competitiveness with the foray into the domestic market and the competitive advantages of the products and services offered. The incidence of political behavior, the intervention of the State in the operating capacity of the enterprise and its impact on organizational behavior. The risk, uncertainty that is generated, to mean that the State takes in relation to the participation of the companies in their economic programmes. Faced with this reality, is born a serious, well defined, where national universities, especially its level pre and postgraduate management schools, should redesign a new Administrator profile and commitment contribute the knowledge needed for that Venezuelan management our case can not only interpret the characteristics of the current scenarios, but be prepared for deal with them, take their profits, successfully venture into them.