As we can observe the difficulty of if desenvolverpesquisas that they glimpse the sustainable development in the Amaznia, in incitaa great challenges, Mello 2000; THERY, 2005; PEAR TREE; RUELLAN, 1991; TUNDISI, 2001; WEIGEL, 2001; both the authors credit that investment in the education nC& T as the best alternative for the dAmaznia sustainable development. Mello (2000) presents as being the two greaters desafiosda scientific research in the Amaznia: the overcoming of the educational deficit eo scientific and technological development. In these two esferasinterdependentes we glimpse the good way to live of the amaznidas ones with apossibilidade of auto-sustainable development adding value to the available recursosnaturais, with the adequate use of technology associated with the ambient necessriapreservao. Of form better to understand the importance of the desafiospropostos for Mello supramentioned on the overcoming of the educational and technological deficit we go to analyze some numbers educational dasinstituies and of research of Brazil to follow. THE EDUCATIONAL DEFICIT AS IMPEDES TO THE DESNVOLVIMENTOSUSTENTAVEL. In the cadastre of Justinian codes of Education Superior of the InstitutoNacional de Ensino and Pesquisa – INEP (2005), present bastantesignificativas information in what it says respect to number of level institutions superiore the great discrepancies in the access and or the ingression of concluintes pupils doensino medium in the modality of superior education can affect directly aqualidade of life and the chances that the educational process can generate emuma region, observes that in the Center-South, specifically in the State of SoPaulo: ' ' That we observe to be anica unit of the federacy with the biggest number of registered institutions of educaosuperior in Cadastro of the Inep (568), followed of Minas Gerais (329), Paran (183), Rio De Janeiro (134), and Bahia (120). It enters the states with menornmero of registered institutions are: Acre (9), Amap (11), Sergipe (12), Roraima (13) and Amazon and Rio Grande of the North (20). .
Therefore the region as enclosure for bullfighting politics presents good and bad aspects, since it serves in such a way of apparatus for the development of this region how much for the legitimation of the power for the high social classrooms. However, the regions hold distinct forms and contents in the contradictory process of the capitalism. The production way does not guarantee the homogeneity of the regions. In contrast, it instigates the differences as form to produce, in each place, some type of comparative advantage for the accumulation of capital. Here, Jeff Gennette expresses very clear opinions on the subject. The internationalization of the capital showed the atony in if having a static concept of region, and how much it is important to be I resell always it, modifying, bringing up to date the region with the society, with the ways of production, the diverse systems, and the regional environment.
Thus, the region if would define as the result of the possibilities in it gifts, generated for the capital fixture and the relations politics, social and cultural existing inside of it. The region is the result of the flow of internal and external actions. .